Several years ago, a show was
done at LSU titled The Smoking Lesson. To
this day, it’s one of my favorite shows. It’s a coming of age story, with
themes of adolescence, wanderlust, and mental illness. It’s an extremely raw
original story and all of the characters are so complex. I identified with the
coming of age struggle, and the challenges that the main characters were
constantly facing in terms of friendship and romantic feelings. Although I
loved the show, there wasn’t one specific message that stayed with me or
changed me. I didn’t have an “ah-ha” moment of sorts. So although I was
extremely entertained by the production and connected to it on a personal
level, it didn’t necessarily “inform” me of a specific idea.
A production that convinced
me of something True, I would have
to say is Dog Sees God. I loved this
play from the first time I read the script to when Daniel Matthews direct it
here at LSU. This show as a whole really made me reflect on the way I treat
people on a day-to-day basis. You never know what has happened in someone’s day
or even in his or her lifetime. Dog Sees
God highlights the importance of human interaction, and how much we affect
one another. I left really embracing the Truth
of human relationships, and thinking about how much we can affect each other in
both negative and positive ways.
I believe that documentary or
“verbatim” theatre can offer new or clarified truth, whereas non-documentary
theatre doesn’t necessarily offer the element of truth that nonfictional
theatre retains. Although Dog Sees God really
stirs the idea of the importance of human reacting, this exact story doesn’t
reign true the way the events of Spill do.
I do think there is some overlap, and both elements of truth are important,
however there is a difference between thematic truth and physical truth of
events that occur in a script.
It's worth noting that plays you've seen have granted you a change in perspective that made you more conscious of your day to day impressions of individuals. Because it's concept that definitely defines verbatim theatre which is very much based off of observing and understanding true to life individuals in order to recreate a specific individual's presence on stage. In other words, what I think I'm hearing from you is; redefining truth or "clarifying truth" as you put it, is attained with a much greater impact when the source material comes from the thoughts and words of real people whether fictionalized or not, so long as it is presented a specific way. Which is a concept that I tend to agree with in regard to this specific type of theatre.
ReplyDelete