Monday, October 13, 2014

Prompt #6


With the development of other artistic mediums including technology, there may be a “danger” of losing theatre as an artistic expression. However, I do not think we ever will. There are so many reasons that traditional theatre has stuck around for as long as it has. For example, many theatre practitioners are familiar with the work of Shakespeare. His work appeals to such a large variety of people, audience members and artists alike, so it still creates human connections when it is performed. Audiences enjoy taking part in the tradition that is, “a night at the theatre.” Experientially, film is a very different experience. You walk into the theatre, sit down, watch the film, and leave. In theatre, there is the experience of interacting with those around you and the actors onstage during the viewing process. Nothing technological will every completely replace humans, in one room, connecting over the art that is occurring onstage. Although film creates the ability to view from different perspectives, people are often much more fulfilled absorbing each other’s energies in a room, which is why theatre will stay strong.
In this technological era, it is nearly impossible to experience current events or personal happenings without the influence of the media, specifically social media. One example of this is the announcement that Highland Coffees was slated to close. I was on facebook on my phone, mindlessly scrolling, when I noticed a headline one of my friends had shared. The article was companied with a raging rant against Hank Saurage, the property manager. In addition to being sad about my favorite coffee shop’s potential end, I was also automatically extremely angry by virtue of the fact that my friend who posted it was extremely angry. On the one hand, it was a very impersonal way to find out about something so personal. On the other hand, media actually benefitted the situation because the people of Baton Rouge were given time to stand up and fight for something that holds a special place in their hearts. The problem is that media takes issues that are very emotional or intense, and makes them impersonal. Art and theatre are making the effort to bring back the emotion and intensity. Part of the reason that I love going to shows or art galleries so much is because of how in tune with my emotions it makes me feel. The growing of technology and media pushes people towards art forms, because it causes them to have to search for some truthful human connection/emotion.


3 comments:

  1. I think you said exactly what I couldn't articulate- we crave human connection, and while film is a wonderful form of entertainment, theatre forces us to be involved. Well said, Morgan Dorfer ;)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I completely agree. The reason film has not completely taken over theatre is because theatre, in whatever form, allows us to suspend our disbelief a bit further than if we are watching something on film. The reality effect of theatre is stronger than that of film. It seems more unmediated because one is actually in attendance and, therefore, is more real. BUT, there's still a time for a good movie, just as there is still a time for a good piece of theatre. The same is true of performance art and theatre.
    Performance art has certainly taken on more "theatrical" tendencies, but the two could never truly merge. One is way more mediated than the other. Performance art is typically interested in the “right here, right now.” Something is happening. It is a more truthful experience. Theatre, naturalistic theatre, in particular, tries hard to REPRESENT the “right here, right now.” How many times have I heard an acting teacher say, “Remember that this experience your character is going through is happening for the first time,” despite the fact that you’ve done the scene/monologue 25 times. It’s not a truthful experience because it is a represented experience. Neither performance art nor theatre is good or bad and one certainly isn’t better than the other because they are completely different forms. They can get close, but their identities can never merge.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I admire your optimism towards the fact that people still make theatre an evening event, but I think that viewpoint is 100% debatable. The fact is, you've overlooked the currently trending norm that is; staying in, as opposed to going out, in order to receive entertainment satiation. You mentioned people enjoy partaking in the tradition that is, "a night at the theatre". While I do see merit in this, I also believe that those people are the minority. Really, the same can be said for going to a theater to watch film as well. I've made this argument in one of my early posts as well, but I believe it's still relevant to this topic, because both in theatre and film audiences are beginning to show disinterest in actually "making a night out of" an event, as opposed to staying home to stream their entertainment through Netflix or YouTube. I think the very fact that people have to get off their ass and actually go to the theatre is what lends itself to being more of a chore to people than a treat.

    ReplyDelete